Episode Baru Polemik Dewan Pengawas RSUD, SK 2021 Digunakan Kembali, Asep MP Juga Menilai Dirinya Sendiri!

By Jurnalis Berita

🌍 Translate this article:

TASIKMALAYA, Thecuy.com – There’s something interesting in the controversy surrounding the Supervisory Board of RSUD dr Soekardjo in Tasikmalaya City. Initially, the public only debated one name: Asep Maman Permana.

Then the issue of civil servant status arose. Next, leave. Following that, the composition of the Supervisory Board. After that, the matter of propriety.

Now another new chapter has emerged. The 2021 SK. Yes. Five years ago. According to the objection material submitted, the selection process for the Supervisory Board for the 2026‑2031 period is allegedly still using SK Team Assessor Number 500/Kep.679-Ek/2021 dated October 1, 2021.

GERINDRA DAN KDM: SIAPA MEMBUTUHKAN SIAPA?Kuda Hitam Gerindra!

That SK, according to the party submitting the objection, is the decision to form an ad‑hoc team for the appointment process of the Supervisory Board for the 2022‑2027 period.

The team had been working. The result was the decision to appoint the Supervisory Board in 2022.

Then why was the old team’s SK used again for the 2026 selection process? Does the assessor team have a term that lasts as long as a bureaucratic dynasty? Or is there another mechanism that allows the SK to remain usable?

This is the first question that must be answered by the Tasikmalaya City Government. Because in government administration, an old document is not automatically a document that still has authority.

If the 2021 SK is still valid, show the basis for its continuation. If the task is already completed, explain how the assessor team’s authority for the 2026 process was obtained. Let’s not have a modern government using expired documents for new work.

Like using an old driving licence to drive a new vehicle. It may have the same form. But the authority issue is different.

There are still other problems. In the objection material, it is mentioned that the recruitment announcement for the Supervisory Board has been opened on 31 August 2026.

Meanwhile, the SK for the dismissal of the old Supervisory Board was only signed on 14 September 2026. The difference is about two weeks.

Membaca Manuver Amir Mahpud: Herdiat-Dony untuk 2029, KDM ke Mana?Kader PKK Harus Jadi Garda Terdepan, Penanganan Anak Tidak Sekolah Hingga Urusan Sampah di Kota Tasikmalaya

The question is simple: why has the recruitment of new members already started when the decision to dismiss the old members has not yet been published?

Is there really a mechanism that allows the process to run concurrently? Or is there an administrative stage that should have been completed first?

This is not about who came to the office first. This is about the order of decisions. In bureaucracy, a date can be very important. One date can differentiate whether an action was taken based on authority or rather preceded authority.

Baca juga Berita lainnya di News Page

Terimakasih sudah mengunjungi thecuy . :)"

Tinggalkan komentar