Komisi I DPRD Kabupaten Tasikmalaya menyatakan bahwa pemilihan dewan pengawas RSUD KHZ Musthafa adalah tidak sah.

TASIKMALAYA, Thecuy.com – The debate over the appointment and dismissal of the supervisory board (Dewas) of the Regional Public Service Agency (BLUD) RSUD KHZ Musthafa in Tasikmalaya Regency shows no signs of abating.

Even within the Tasikmalaya Regency DPRD, there are divergent opinions about the legitimacy of the Regent’s Decree (SK) that serves as the basis for replacing the hospital’s supervisory board, which belongs to the local government.

Aldira Yusup Dikrian, a member of Commission I of the Tasikmalaya Regency DPRD, echoed the earlier statement by the Chairman of Commission IV, who asserted that the replacement process of the Supervisory Board was legally sound.

Defeated two internal government officials, Kurniawan was officially inaugurated as Secretary of the Tasikmalaya Regency. To enhance project risk mitigation, PT Askrindo and the Tasikmalaya Regency PUTRLH Service collaborate.

In Aldira’s view, that conclusion conflicts with the legal review conducted jointly with the West Java Regional Office of the Ministry of Law.

Aldira stressed that the core issue is not the Regent’s authority as the regional head, but the administrative procedures that must be observed in compliance with the prevailing laws and regulations.

“I observe administrative and procedural shortcomings that could undermine the decision’s validity. This is not merely a matter of interpretive differences, but touches upon the legality of an administrative state decision,” he told Radar on Sunday, July 12, 2026.

According to this PAN politician, an official consultation between Commission I and Commission IV of the Tasikmalaya Regency DPRD and the West Java Regional Office of the Ministry of Law concluded that if a decision contains administrative, procedural, or substantive defects, the local government must perform an administrative correction.

He noted that under governmental administrative law, an official who issues a decision is obligated to rectify it when a legal defect is discovered, whether concerning authority, procedure, or substance.

Correction can be effected by revoking the decision, amending its content, or issuing a new decision that conforms to the legal provisions.

“If the issue pertains to substance and the legal basis for decision‑making, the appropriate step is not merely to amend the wording. The local government should rescind the decision and issue a new decree that complies with the regulations,” he asserted.

Pangdam III/Siliwangi provided guidance to 2,211 personnel of the TP Unit Phase IV. The West Java DPRD supports the operation of Husein Airport, yet BIJB Kertajati must remain optimal.

Aldira acknowledged that the appointment and dismissal of the BLUD Supervisory Board indeed falls under the attributive authority of the regional head. Nonetheless, that authority must be exercised in line with the provisions of the Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation No. 79 of 2018 concerning Regional Public Service Agencies (BLUD).

Baca juga berita lainnya di Halaman Berita